WSJ sings the blues

November 9th, 2006 ~ Political circus

The e-mail I get from the Wall St. Journal opinion analysts had some points about the election similar to mine, except, y’know, better and less crass. (Show-offs!) I promise to get off the political stuff for a while after this, but here is a list from James Taranto of what was good about yesterday’s results:

  • Republicans deserved to lose. They arrived a dozen years ago promising reform and smaller government. They did deliver a very successful welfare reform law — but that was over a decade ago. What legislative accomplishments they have delivered since have mostly consisted in approving President Bush’s initiatives, which is something, but far from the “revolution” they promised in 1994.
  • It was not a referendum on Iraq. One of the most pro-Iraq lawmakers in Congress, Sen. Joe Lieberman, ran as an independent and trounced anti-Iraq Democratic nominee Ned Lamont. Meanwhile, of the five remaining Republican members of Congress who voted against Iraq’s liberation, three lost: Sen. Lincoln Chafee (R.I.), Rep. John Hostettler (Ind.) and Rep. Jim Leach (Iowa). Only two anti-Iraq Republicans will return to the 110th Congress: Reps. Jimmy Duncan (Tenn.) and Ron Paul (Texas).The Associated Press reports that while “three-fourths of voters said corruption and scandal were important to their votes, . . . Iraq was important for just two-thirds.” Both groups tended to favor Democrats.
  • It was not a victory for the left. Lieberman’s victory over Lamont should be sufficient to establish this, but also, as we noted last week, the Democrats nominated many moderates for Congress, including Heath Shuler in North Carolina and Bob Casey and Chris Carney in Pennsylvania. (Carney, who beat Rep. Don Sherwood, got an endorsement from Richard Perle at a cocktail party we attended last month.)In 1994 Republicans won Congress by nominating strong conservative candidates in districts long held by the other party. In 2006 Democrats did the same. It will be interesting to watch how Speaker Pelosi mediates between her ultraliberal committee chairman and the moderate freshmen to whom they owe their jobs. … It seems clear America is a center-right country, rather than a center-left one–though the Northeast is an exception. …
  • Victory may prove cathartic for the Angry Left. America’s liberal left, and the Democratic Party more broadly, has been in an unhealthy emotional state ever since Bill Clinton’s impeachment eight years ago. The 2000 election controversy made things much worse for them, and led them to respond to their string of election losses since by lashing out and claiming the elections were stolen.No one on the left will claim the 2006 election was stolen. They won fair and square, partly because of GOP complacency and partly because the Democrats got smart about candidate recruitment. …

Leave a Reply


Bad Behavior has blocked 326 access attempts in the last 7 days.