“The Hours” — Depression in movies

November 9th, 2006 ~ Movies I liked or didn't

The HoursI recently rented “The Hours” from Netflix. It’s an elegant, poignant weaving together of three women’s lives — Virginia Woolf (Nicole Kidman) circa 1921, a Los Angeles housewife named Laura Brown (Julianne Moore) circa 1951 and a New York editor named Clarissa Vaughn (Meryl Streep) circa 2001.

I’m not going to try to do a decent movie review. I usually don’t have the patience for that, and besides, the thing is probably old news to everyone. But there were aspects to their depiction of life (or maybe just women’s lives) that seemed to beg a little closer investigation, so I wanted to give it a little space here.

The common element is sadness. Sadness should get a credit in this movie, and a big one — it could come alphabetically after Moore but before Streep. And we’re not just talking regular everyday sadness here — it’s that full-blown, no-hope, what-the-F-is-the-point Movie-Sadness that the public just can’t seem to get enough of (or so one would think, judging from its predominance in fiction and films). Does life for thoughtful people have to be that flippin’ awful?

There’s not much doubt that for Virginia Woolf it was. I’ve had a kind of fascination with Woolf that’s based much more on her journals, a relative’s biography and her husband’s memoirs than on her writing (which I’ve never had much luck with). There’s no question that Woolf suffered most of her life with the kind of debilitating mental illness that we’re all too familiar with these days — she appears to be a classic manic-depressive type who had breakdowns, hallucinations and delusions that made her attempt suicide more than once. We just have to guess at how much easier her life would’ve been if she’d been prescribed lithium instead of the kinds of trendy cures favored in the ’20s (like being locked into a dark room to remove all sensory stimulation. Sounds horrible.).
And the most contemporary figure, Clarissa Vaughn, has enough going on in her life for anyone watching to start getting edgy — she’s caring for an ex-lover who is dying of AIDS and trying to plan a party for him that no one (including him) seems to be too keen on attending. The imminent death of someone she loved is making her look back at everything she wanted life to be when they were together and everything that will pass away with his passing.

And then we have the housewife. Laura Brown is a pretty woman in her 20’s with a husband who dotes on her and a sensitive little boy about eight who seems to only want to be around her. And yet, it’s obvious from the first scenes that she’s profoundly unhappy and having a hard time functioning. Why exactly? The movie never tries to say, and you end up inferring that it’s just from the crushing weight of being Suburban, a malaise that elitist culture-producers believe causes whole neighborhoods to suffer, expire and commit hate-crimes all the time.

And what ties all the women together? Well, the book, “Mrs. Dalloway”, that Woolf is writing (in the ’20s) which Brown is reading (in the ’50s) and which Vaughn is, in a way, living (in ‘01) is the clearest symbol. But the strongest tie between them has to be the oncoming blackness of their mental state and what they do about it. That’s the amalgam that holds all of the stories together. Virginia suffers and succumbs — Woolf drowned herself in a river at the age of 59. Laura suffers and makes choices (I won’t give any spoilers), and maybe she wins and maybe she loses — you’re not really sure (I think she loses). Clarissa suffers and has a catthartic breakthrough and in the end, you’re made to believe she has won somehow, though I never did understand how. If you blink you miss it, and I must’ve kept blinking.
But somehow the big winner is still Movie-Sadnesss. The lackadaisical attempt at a happy ending is rushed through in a moment, but the camera dotes lovingly at the beginning and ending of the movie on Woolf’s suicide, as if that was the one thing that we could all take strength from. And maybe that’s the way that artistically-minded people see it — in the special featured biography of Virginia Woolf on the DVD, her suicide was described by friends and biographers as “brave” and “courageous.” Brave? It’s a suicide, not the taking of Normandy Beach. I certainly understand the impulse of sympathetic people to say that given her prolonged illness, it was understandable. But making a hero out of her seems to be making a hero out of depression, and that’s a bad idea.

Does it have to be this way? Do great movies, great plays and great works of fiction always have to make it seem like life is so completely onerous, pointless and unrelentingly dreadful that the sanest ones among us are the ones who either go insane or kill themselves?
That’s what seems to be the case. “The Hours” is a beautiful movie. It’s well-acted and well-directed, as near as I can judge. But you’ll want to watch something zany with a laughtrack right after it or, better yet, do a little religious reading. That’s not just an act of denial or contrariness — it’s an act of self-preservation and a reality check, like breaking out a window to keep you from suffocating.

11 Responses to ““The Hours” — Depression in movies”

  1. Deb Said:

    Okay, sounds like its time for you to rent “Enchanted April”

    I saw the Hours too and was a bit unimpressed. Maybe because I AM a SAHM and don’t see why they have to portray us as lost puppies or brainless child rearers. Brown definitely looses in my book and (okay spoiler alert) drags the rest of the family down with her. I found Woolf’s character the most compelling and would have rather stayed with her the full 2 hours. I enjoyed the original movie better although Vanessa Redgrave wandering around constantly opining “I’m throwing a party!” got a bit irritating.

    Deb

  2. Grace Said:

    I *love* Enchanted April. It is the ONLY movie I know of this type that shows how women can redeem themselves and others (including (gasp!) men) rather than being judgmental, detaching from loved ones or wallowing in self-pity.

    And yes, I didn’t want to just vent, but I didn’t like Brown’s story either. I don’t know what a SAHM is, but maybe I am one, because I’m sick of Hollywood acting like depression is the normal state of family-types and abandonment is excusable.

  3. Wordmama Said:

    SAHM = stay-at-home mom?

  4. Grace Said:

    Ohhh. That’s a good guess. Is that right, Deb?

  5. Grace Said:

    BTW, ‘Mama, I know it sounds like I’m saying this isn’t a good movie, but I would actually recommend it to you in spite of the flaws I think it has. Heck, all movies have flaws, and the good parts (the writing, acting, direction) probably out-weigh the bad.

    You know how it is. When a movie is good, the things you want to fix bug you more. I think that’s why it’s become my habit when I rent a DVD I like to check in with the Netflix member reviews and find out what the people who didn’t like it think was wrong with it.

  6. Wordmama Said:

    Well, and that’s what makes it so frustrating — if they can write that well, why can’t they create something that doesn’t make the world seem like such a grim and miserable place? It’s the same paradox I have with literature: the good stuff is stark and the hopeful stuff is bad. Maybe it’s because the World is all we know firsthand and it’s not exactly a hopeful place. If we knew enough about Heaven to really write about it, we’d hardly be interesting in publishing fiction.

  7. Deb Said:

    Wordmama said:
    “SAHM = stay-at-home mom?”

    Yup- that’s right.

    I’m glad you like “Enchanted April” too. I try to watch it at least every year or two - usually around Feb. or Mar. :)

  8. Michelle Said:

    I was reading through some of your older post this morning and came across this one about The Hours. I have had to tell my husband not to let me watch that movie because every time that I do, I become incredibly depressed for like 24 hours. It is horrible! I don’t know what that movie does to me. So I’ve been trying to watch “happier” movies more recently. Maybe I’ll have to see Enchanted Apil.

  9. Grace Said:

    I understand that. We’re very impressionable to movies showing this kind of deep melancholy by people just going through their lives. It’s when I notice that the characters are actually being very self-centered that I start to be able to break the spell. And when I notice how cold they are to others (what did Laura Brown’s husband and son do to deserve being deserted? And what about poor Leonard Woolf?), I start to get very distrustful of the mood these movies evoke. It’s hard enough to be warm-hearted without movies making that seem shallow or unreasoning.

  10. Leonard Dalloway Said:

    Hi, I watched this movie long time back. I could never understand what Merryl Streep is trying to say at the end but somehow I found it beautiful. perhaps, you could read my first blog entry on http://gpains.blogspot.com/ and let me know what you think is the meaning behind a quote from the movie that I had pasted there.

  11. Grace Said:

    Leonard:
    Argh - sorry! I thought I got back to you, but I must’ve dreamt it or something. But then, I don’t really have a lot to say — I watched the movie so long ago I couldn’t even remember the ending, and looking at what I wrote above, it seems clear to me that it left me in the dark, too. So why IS it called The Hours? Beats me. Did anyone else have a good guess?

Leave a Reply


Bad Behavior has blocked 129 access attempts in the last 7 days.