Bush’s great speech
November 14th, 2005 ~ Current eventsHere’s the full transcript of the speech I heard on Friday. But here are the best parts of it, IMHO. Good stuff, man.
… Our debate at home must also be fair-minded. One of the hallmarks of a free society and what makes our country strong is that our political leaders can discuss their differences openly, even in times of war. When I made the decision to remove Saddam Hussein from power, Congress approved it with strong bipartisan support. I also recognize that some of our fellow citizens and elected officials didn’t support the liberation of Iraq. And that is their right, and I respect it. As President and Commander-in-Chief, I accept the responsibilities, and the criticisms, and the consequences that come with such a solemn decision.
While it’s perfectly legitimate to criticize my decision or the conduct of the war, it is deeply irresponsible to rewrite the history of how that war began. (Applause.) Some Democrats and anti-war critics are now claiming we manipulated the intelligence and misled the American people about why we went to war. These critics are fully aware that a bipartisan Senate investigation found no evidence of political pressure to change the intelligence community’s judgments related to Iraq’s weapons programs.
They also know that intelligence agencies from around the world agreed with our assessment of Saddam Hussein. They know the United Nations passed more than a dozen resolutions citing his development and possession of weapons of mass destruction. And many of these critics supported my opponent during the last election, who explained his position to support the resolution in the Congress this way: “When I vote to give the President of the United States the authority to use force, if necessary, to disarm Saddam Hussein, it is because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a threat, and a grave threat, to our security.” That’s why more than a hundred Democrats in the House and the Senate — who had access to the same intelligence — voted to support removing Saddam Hussein from power. (Applause.)The stakes in the global war on terror are too high, and the national interest is too important, for politicians to throw out false charges. (Applause.) These baseless attacks send the wrong signal to our troops and to an enemy that is questioning America’s will. As our troops fight a ruthless enemy determined to destroy our way of life, they deserve to know that their elected leaders who voted to send them to war continue to stand behind them. (Applause.) Our troops deserve to know that this support will remain firm when the going gets tough. (Applause.) And our troops deserve to know that whatever our differences in Washington, our will is strong, our nation is united, and we will settle for nothing less than victory. (Applause.)
November 14th, 2005 at 7:49 pm
I agree, Grace–good stuff. I would have liked to have heard this earlier; why so long in coming? And another thing: Even though I know how it would play in the media (poorly), I would love the Prez to drop the “my opponent” gig and just say John Kerry. Call him out, George–and then bitchslap him. He deserves it, as do the rest of the lot. . . .
November 15th, 2005 at 11:56 am
I heard that he originally did list Kerry by name, but on one of the re-writes it got nixed. I’m not sure I understand why — was it supposed to sound more civil that way? I’m surprised Kerry didn’t leap on the opportunity to try to get some limelight again.
I’m with you — this was a long time in coming. The recent news has allllll been about how Bush’s presidency is in crisis and he’s melllting, melllllllting. Whatever. Maybe he felt like he needed to do something, but I’d like to think that he finally just got fed up.
November 15th, 2005 at 7:42 pm
I was so very grateful to hear this speech finally from a man I believe is fighting the good fight. I, too, have wearied of the Left claiming they knew it was a mistake all along but the mean Republicans duped them. You know, they either should stand by their original position (a position held by the majority of the world) or claim they were clueless and just agreed with whatever the Right fed them.
I was also grateful to find this on your site. Too often my fellow Orthodox are too critical of our President not considering the alternative. This president has more integrity in one speech than his predecessor had in two terms.
November 16th, 2005 at 12:36 pm
Nicolas -
Very glad to hear you say that. I have noticed the same thing, and I’m never sure what to make of it. But everyone has to follow their conscience, I suppose.
Speaking just for myself, I like George Bush, and I think there’s a kind of greatness in him that I admire all the more given that he is so completely ridiculed by many, many people. I doubt that we’ll see such an unapologetically devout Christian in that office again for some time, and I do think that it makes a difference. I dearly wish that he hadn’t seen fit to spend the way that he has, and there have been missteps, but on the whole, I don’t understand why Christians (and other devout religious people) would be cool towards him. Oh well.